<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Sunday, August 10, 2003

Downloading 


Reading this post from Michele Catalano reminds me of one of the reasons why I'm in favor of prosecuting downloaders: many of them have no respect for private property. It's not that they don't think they're stealing, or that they really wouldn't have bought the album if they had not downloaded it. My problem with them is that they know they're stealing, and they don't care.

Many of these people want the record companies to go out of business through their activities. This piece from several weeks ago is representative. The writer thinks that he has come up with a new and legal way to fileshare that will survive the courts. Also, if his "Snapster" plan is indeed legal and implemented, all the record companies would go bankrupt. Which, of course, is exactly what he wants:

But what about the poor record companies and their owners?

To paraphrase Marie Antoinette, if they have no sales, let them buy stock. There is nothing that would keep owners of record company shares from selling those shares and replacing them with Snapster shares. The earlier they do so the more they would benefit both because they'd be selling before the record company shares went completely in the tank, and they'd be buying before Snapster shares had fully appreciated. It is one thing to maintain the status quo and another to recognize the inevitability of change and benefit from it.

Investors in companies that manufactured horse drawn carriages could have tried to make automobiles illegal or they could have sold their carriage shares and bought car shares. Which makes more sense? There is more money to be made by embracing this future than by fighting it.
Completely missing from his analogy was the part where the auto companies investors stole the horses from the carriages.

Whether it's a good strategy for the RIAA to target individual downloaders, I don't know, but I sure won't have any sympathy for those who got caught.
Comments: Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?