wasn't it about the oil?In a story about the UK looking to have the Security Council formally end sactions against Libya, Reuters reports: Lifting the U.N. sanctions would have only a symbolic impact as they were suspended in 1999 after Libya turned over two suspects for trial in connection with the Pan Am bombing. If we really needed oil, why not lift these sanctions? Libya has essentially come full circle and claimed responsibility for the PanAm bombing, if the United States is an amoral beast with a thirst for oil, wouldn't we end sanctions which have outlived the Reagan-era policy makers who put them in place in order to aquire access to oil? |