While I was away ...I see that Manny is still in Boston, Matrix 3 sucked, and the Democrats lose again. And even the economy is getting better. Priceless quote, from Polipundit: "I think the leading economic indicator is the Democrats have stopped talking about the economy." |
The Mass Media Roundup (**updated**)1) Something i'm involved with... Make sure you contribute to the Watermark! Why some people really are no fun, emphasis added: Last year the journal was at the heart of a controversy concerning flyers they had posted seeking submissions. A '50s style pinup girl, in ruffled underwear and bent at the waist, peeked out at viewers from between her legs, with the message "Sometimes exposure is a good thing." Although the co-editors said it was meant to be humorous and they did not consider it explicitly sexual, some members of the Women's Center found the image offensive and raised questions as to whether the picture was appropriate for display at a public university. Unknown pranksters responded by printing counter-flyers similar to The Watermark's but using pornographic pictures involving two men. This year their flyers are still funny, but avoid the risqué. Now Mr. T's face plasters the walls pitying the fool who doesn't submit to The Watermark. 2) Other obnoxious right wing ideologues featured on the Op-Ed page... Business Student to Socialists - "What Exactly is the Alternative?" If you weren't on the UMass campus Thursday you missed the following scene. On the second floor of McCormick Hall the Socialists had set up a table for people to congregate around while they passed out copies of some Workers Justice newspaper or some such nonsense. Attached to their table was a large red construction paper sign, upon which written in big letters was their slogan "Tax The Rich!" with a subtitle advertisement "The Socialist Alternative". I really wish I had gotten a picture. 3) More MassPIRG. On the heels of last weeks Editorial Against Censorship ace reporter and fellow blogger Gin Dumcius reports that the UMass Boston Student Senate has approved $1,141.12 in funding for 10 MassPIRG students to attend a conference in Hartford Conneticut. The meat of the problem: Senate President Tuan Pham, in his first ever veto, had charged the Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group (MassPIRG) Club with "double-dipping." Since MassPIRG "presently recieves money from students through a waivable fee system," there was no need for the senate to approve the $1141.12 the club needed to go to a conference in Hartford Connecticut, he said.THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE TO PAY FOR HALF!?!? I could justify a 50/50 split... Question for Gin: Doesn't this violate a UMB Student Senate policy? I thought the Student Senate resolved to not fund trips for clubs out of state? I can't recall whether this was a result of a certain Chess Club attempting to use school money to fund its trip to a CT Casino even though they were going to attend a Chess tournament, or if it was fall out from the Casa Latino using school money to fund a Ski trip for its members last year... but I do seem to recall that this was a source of controversy in the past. UPDATE: Gin replied through e-mail. He says that the travel policy I spoke of was related to the national threat level at the time, and that this policy never prevented travel inside New England. Additionally he adds that "I forgot to mention that all who were going on the trip were supposed to pay $20, whether they were MassPIRG members or not. Pham disagreed with this, because he believed that if PIRG was one of the sponsors of the conference, the money was going back to them anyway. MassPIRG stated that all of the money was going towards the conference." 4) Here's a story about that Patriotism conference that I attended. Lisa Rivera, my former professor, is quoted often at the end of the article. While I don't recall the specific quote listed in the last paragraph of the article, it does summarize the panel discussion very well. No, my "Michael Moore is a liar" spiel wasn't referred to. |
Advantage: InstapunditMight have just been an oversight, but why do I need to go to Instapundit to see this news story that I didn't hear a peep about in a week in Hong kong? The "stainless-steel mouse" is her cyber nom de plume. Her name is Liu Di, and in the one picture available, she has a young face and a wide, shy smile. Until the authorities tracked her down a year ago Friday, she was one of the most famous Internet web masters in China. |
Saturdays on AIMNick: good news: Someone conned all the public law schools in New England to offer a slightly cheaper rates to in New England students, especially those states w/o a public law school Nick: better news: Mass is the only state w/o a public law school Nick: damn us Hei Lun: you should complain about this to the state Democratic Party Nick: boo, Dean isn't taking matching funds Nick: I voted for him to do that Hei Lun: I'm sure they based it on the vote Nick: now I don't have to feel bad about breaking my promise to vote for Dean Nick: cuz you had to fill out this affidavit in order to register for the poll Nick: those bastards Hei Lun: so al sharpton it is then Hei Lun: did you see the dean "declaration"? Nick: nope Nick: what is that? Hei Lun: http://blog.deanforamerica.com/archives/002191.html#more Nick: so why isn't he accepting matching funds? Hei Lun: because he can get more money without it? Nick: more money from special interests! Hei Lun: no those are money from regular people Hei Lun: bush is the one that gets money from special interests Hei Lun: if you can't get that straight you might as well not call yourself a Democrat Nick: haha Nick: touche |
the code of the schoolyardWhy you should never tattle on your friends: Punk. Also helpful: You too can get away with underage drinking . Why you should always carry extra rounds: Then maybe you won't get caught! Black people get the worst of everything: He should have pulled his earings out. Our final lesson: Adults never get in trouble for anything. |
well saidAustralian Labor Party barrister Jim Nolan on Saddam apologist Tariq Ali: Marx famously observed in his 18th Brumaire of Louis Napoleon that history repeated itself - first as tragedy and then as farce. Tariq Ali's piece of invective masquerading as analysis ("Occupied Iraq will never know peace", on Wednesday) called this instantly to mind.What highly enlightened shining example of muddle thought newspaper published Tariq's diatribe? The Guardian. Go read the hateful words for yourself. Hat tip to Michael Totten. |
re: Censorshp sillyness...James Carville agrees with my definition of censorship. From today's episode of Crossfire: CARVILLE: Yes, indeed. |
Dispatch from the people's republic, part 3Hong Kong is supposedly a center of commerce, so I got dragged around to various malls where I get to stand around doing nothing for 5 hours. Some observations: --Everything is on sale! 10% off, 20% off, 30% off, even 70% off! Basically, everything here is sold like how Persian rugs are in the US. It's not only roadside stores or those that sell seasonal goods, it's major department stores, even the high end ones. For people who live here, they probably know what is a good price and what isn't, but it's impossible for most tourists. --With floating prices there is also a lot of haggling. Even when something has a price tag on it and it's "on sale", the price is still negotiable. Of everything I bought, I paid the listed price at only 1 store. Not that I know how to do it; this was all done by my mom who seems to be an expert at this kind of thing. --"I'm not crazy I'm just a little unwell ..." All the stores that try to be cool here play American pop music. I remember hearing songs from Sister Hazel, Michelle Branch, Three Doors Down, Five For Fighting, Beyonce, and Dido. --Many stores also have English (or at least non-Chinese) names. Among them there were some pretty hilarious names. Many of them take an English word and changes it by one of two letters, and turns it into something with a completely different meaning. One place I saw reference something inappropriate about a cherry. And guess what the store "Enter the Password" sells? --Saw a Grant Hill poster in a sneakers store. Heh. --Bad design: the escalators in malls are all in random places. If you want to go from the first floor to the fourth floor, you would need to find the escalator to the second floor, walk to a different part of the mall to find the escalator to the third floor, and repeat this process another floor up. --Stores here openly sell counterfeit merchandise. The most auspicious are those selling CDs and VCDs; it's much easier to find a place that sells the counterfeit stuff than originals. There were also a lot of counterfeit stuff of Disney and other cartoon characters. Since no Hong Kong company stands to benefit from curtailing counterfeit stuff, the government doesn't bother to do it. |
can't beat the MTV news titleTenacious D Hunger Strike Proves They're Just Hungry For Attention: NEW YORK — They were supposed to remain suspended in a glass cage above Times Square for 45 days. Tenacious D didn't even make it 45 minutes.If you love Jack Black's humor you have got to pick up Tenacious D's album. I own it, and it is simply wonderful. It works on that supreme level of parody, done so well in the conventions of the medium that you're prone to forget that you are witness to a parody. For further examples of the supreme level of parody, see Simpsons seasons 2-5,6,7,8 or 9... determining when exactly The Simpsons jumped the shark will be a future blog post, just as soon as I need distraction from a really big project. Finals aren't too far away! UPDATE: I see Viking Pundit really outdid me in the D joke department. |
welcome to 1999Dan Drezner discovers the Political Compass: Taking the survey, I was shocked, shocked to discover that I'm a economic and social libertarian!!* ":Taking the survey, I was shocked, shocked to discover that I'm a economic and social libertarian!!" I've taken the test a half dozen or so times in my lifetime, and I remember that dating back to high school I consistently scored with coordinates between 0 and1 as economically (un)liberal and 0 and -1 as socially liberal. Yes, I've been a lame moderate all my life. The test has been updated for the post 9-11 world, and here is my new score: Economic Left/Right: -3.25 Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.38 What the heck hapened to me? I blame this entirely on their revamped questions about the relationship between the citizen and the state. Those few cleverly disguised questions about Terrorism and the Patrioct ACT must have thrown my score off. Yeah, that's it. I'll retake the test in a few days, after the stress of midterms this week has erased my answers from my mind. Developing... |
blog round up before The Simpsons come on1) I don't understand this at all... the WaPo reports that Maryland Democrats are outraged that Republican Governor Robert L. Ehrlich wants to prevent the increase of tuition at state universities: Ehrlich reiterated his desire for a tuition cap yesterday, telling reporters outside the State House that his radio comments were not an off-the-cuff response to a caller's question. Neither, he said, were they a politically calculated reaction to a recent poll that showed 83 percent of Marylanders opposing a proposal to double tuition over the next six years. That proposal was made by Richard E. Hug, a close ally of Ehrlich and one of the governor's first appointees to the university Board of Regents.... so Democrats aren't even in favor of an affordable public education anymore? I understand that the Democrats only want to maintain a high level of services at the University of Maryland, but they understand how issue's like this are framed against them... don't they? (Link via Campus Press Notes who rightly characterizes this HB2400 cartoon as cool) 2) Censorship sillyness... both The Mass Media and CBS television staffers grossly misunderstand the meaning of censorship. On the one hand The Mass Media says that any defunding of the paper constitutes censorship? Isn't this simply absurd? If I 'Waive That Fee' I'm not censoring you, I'm just chosing not to allow you to express your free speech on my dime. Similarly, if UMass swaps to an opt-in system this is not censorship either. By their own admission it seems a good amount of students neglect to opt-out: "To date at UMass Boston about 45% of students pay their Mass Media waivable fee each year, and this number will decrease drastically if HB 2400 passes. Some portion of the fees collected each year come from students who forgot to opt out, but if those same students forget to opt in, The Mass Media and others will lose funding." The Mass Media's free speech rights are not dependant upon those who forget to opt-out, and would not be revoked by those people chose not to opt-in. I'm so frustrated with The Mass Media right now. The point made above is an incredibly minor point in their editorial, an editorial I really agree with... but.... it's just such a dunderheaded point! Subtract those few sentences and The Mass Media has made a spectacular argument against HB2400, but I suppose they couldn't rest on the laurels of sound reasoning and threw in that reactionary liberal lunacy to sound more like their Indy Media friends. Doesn't The Mass Media basically admit that it steals from people? The say that they anticipate the movement from an opt-out system to an opt-in system would defund them. Why? Because those who don't opt-out won't opt-in? Why? Implicit in their argument is that they're receiving funds from people who don't intend to give them funds. Taking money that wasn't given to you... isn't that stealing? Well... not really, but it is kind of... it isn't honest, and for them to claim that they are the victims here just really bugs me. CBS has an equal amount of dunderheads in their midst. In an article about the public outrage towards the mini-series 'The Reagans' a CBS staffer claims that public pressure against CBS to alter the movie amounts to censorship. That is just ludicrous. CBS has every right to make whatever kind of movie it wants to. No one is calling for a public law against saying bad things about Ronnie. What this CBS staffer needs explained to him/her is that television is an ad driven medium, and when you piss off the people they're not going to tune it, and when people don't tune in you piss off your advertisers. It is those advertisers who effectively have the final say over the broadcast. This isn't censorship, it's capitalism, it's how you make your living. Wise up. 3) Watching CBS 60 Minutes and they're doing a segment on the bootlegging of DVDs on the internet. They intervewed the President of a Peer-to-Peer networking company who said that he can't be held responsible for piracy because his company has "no way of knowing what people are downloading." Question: Doesn't this mimic the gun industry saying that it can't be held responsible for what people do with guns? |
the wayback microfiche machineIn a follow-up to a previous 'what was written about the German occupation' piece, Instapundit's readers have discovered a two parter in The Saturday Evening Post entitled How We Botched the German Occupation. |
because you can't make an ass of your organization often enoughMatt Groening told NPR this week that Fox News Channel threatened to sue The Simpsons over a faux-news crawl found in an episode of The Simpsons where Krusty the Clow ran for office: According to Groening, Fox took exception took a Simpsons' version of the Fox News rolling news ticker which parodied the channel's anti-Democrat stance, with headlines like "Do Democrats Cause Cancer?" |
Name that candidateGuess which Democratic presidential candidate Alex Massie is talking about? There's some truth in that, but the air is also going out of _____'s campaign because you simply can't keep muddling your position on the most important issue of the day - national security and foreign policy - and expect no-one to either notice or care. _____'s been guilty of trying to be too cute: in an attempt to persuade Democrats that he's one of them ... he's destroyed much of his credibility on these vital issues. It's not just a lack of organisation that is responsible for crippling his campaign, it's policy too (even if, to be fair, his health plan looks better than some of the other candidates' proposals - but even if it is, no-one is paying it any attention. That tells you how much damage his waffling on the war is doing to his campaign).Hint: surprisingly, not John Kerry. |